RALEIGH, NC – (AP) – North Carolina judges on Friday struck down the state’s latest photo-voter identification law, agreeing with minority voters that Republicans had imposed racially-biased rules like way to stay in power.
Two of the three trial judges who heard a trial said the December 2018 law was unconstitutional, despite being designed to implement a voter identification warrant with a photo added to the Carolina Constitution. North in a referendum a few weeks earlier. They said the law intentionally discriminates against black voters, violating their equal protections.
The “was motivated at least in part by an unconstitutional intention to target African-American voters,” wrote Superior Court justices Michael O’Foghludha and Vince Rozier in their 100-page majority opinion. “Other, less restrictive voter identification laws would have been sufficient to achieve the legitimate non-racial objectives of implementing the constitutional amendment requiring voter identification, deterring fraud or enhancing voter confidence.”
The majority decision, which followed a three week trial in April, now likely heading to a state appeals court, which previously blocked law enforcement last year while the case was heard. The law remains inapplicable with this decision.
With a similar trial in federal court due in January and another trial in state court currently on appeal, it seems more unlikely that a voter identification warrant for in-person and postal voting will emerge. produce in the 2022 election.
GOP legislative leaders have tried for a decade to require photo ID to vote.
Republicans said voter identification laws were needed to boost public confidence in elections and prevent voter fraud, which remains rare nationwide. But many Democrats see the mandates as attempts to suppress voters.
In July 2016, a federal appeals court overturned several parts of a 2013 election law in North Carolina that included a voter identification mandate, saying GOP lawmakers wrote them with “almost surgical precision. To discourage voting by black voters, who tend to support Democrats.
Lawyers for voters who sued the 2018 law said it suffered from the same racial flaws as the 2013 law – following a long effort by North Carolina officials to weaken the African-American vote in order to retain control of the General Assembly. The 2013 law was briefly applied in the 2016 primary elections.
GOP legislative leaders and their lawyers disagreed, saying the latest ID rules were approved with substantial Democratic support and improved to retain access to ballots while ensuring that only citizens legal can vote.
The categories of eligible identity documents have been significantly broadened compared to the 2013 law to include the identification documents of students and government employees. Free IDs are also available from county election boards or early voting sites, and people without ID can still vote if they fill out a form at the polling station.
In a dissenting opinion, Judge Nathaniel Poovey wrote that the passage of the voter identification law is consistent with the state’s constitution, citing his support from several black lawmakers and citizens voting in the constitutional referendum.
âThe evidence of competence before this three-judge panel does not suggest that our legislature enacted this law with racially discriminatory intent,â Poovey wrote.
But the majority of the panel decided that the changes did not completely eliminate racial prejudice and permanently blocked the application of the identification law.
Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.